Multiple anthropogenic pressures have been reduced to levels that are not detrimental to the conservation of migratory species or to the functioning, integrity, ecological connectivity and resilience of their habitats.
Note: The pressures concerned may include those relating to climate change, renewable energy developments, power lines, by-catch, underwater noise, ship strikes, poisoning, pollution, disease, invasive species, illegal and unsustainable take and marine debris.
Expected result
This target does not expect a total inventory of all anthropogenic pressures on migratory species and their habitats, and it does not necessarily expect all such pressures to be reduced to non-detrimental levels. It may instead be fulfilled by reducing to such levels a sub-set of pressures that are selected for this attention (for example because they are the most urgent, or the best understood, or the most amenable to change, or for some other reason).
While the target therefore does not create an expectation of change in all relevant pressures, there should be a demonstrable change in a good number of them (“multiple”). Fully assessing the achievement of this target will require information on:
- The agreed definition of a range of types of pressures that can be assessed in this way.
- The presence of a detectable reduction in the “level” of a given pressure (which may involve a change in its magnitude, intensity, severity, duration, cumulative impact, geographical spread or some other relevant parameter), perceived relative to a defined baseline state.
- The “level” of a given pressure that constitutes the threshold between detrimental and non-detrimental effects on migratory species.
- The “level” of a given pressure that constitutes the threshold between detrimental and non-detrimental effects on the functioning, integrity, ecological connectivity and resilience of the habitats of migratory species.
- The relationship at a defined point in time between the actual levels of pressure described above and the “threshold” levels described above.
If the “threshold” levels as described above can be known or plausibly proposed, then there is no need to assess the achievement of this target by direct measurements of the conservation status of the migratory species concerned, or of the functioning, integrity, ecological connectivity and resilience of their habitats (sometimes referred to as the “receiving environment”). If on the other hand in a given instance it proves more practical to measure these “ecological outcome” parameters, then the extent to which they are attributable to a reduction in the level of relevant pressures will need to be known.
A - Outreach, promotion and uptake of the Plan
- CMS Communication Strategy (under development)
- Programme of Work of the Central Asian Mammals Initiative
- Saiga-Medium-Term International Work Programme
- Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Sharks; Conservation Plan
B - The delivery framework
- CMS COP Resolution 11.29 (2014) on Sustainable boat-based marine wildlife watching
- CMS COP Resolution 11.30 (2014) on Management of marine debris
- CMS COP Resolution 9.19 (2008) on adverse anthropogenic marine/ocean noise impacts on cetaceans and other biota
- CMS COP Resolution 10.24 (2011) on Further steps to abate underwater noise pollution for the protection of cetaceans and other migratory species
- ASCOBANS Resolution 7.4 on Impacts of chemical pollution on small cetaceans
- ASCOBANS Resolution 6.2 on adverse effects of underwater noise on marine mammals during offshore construction activities for renewable energy production
- ASCOBANS Mitigation Guidance for intense noise generating activities in the ASCOBANS region
- Workshop on offshore windfarms and marine mammals
- Workshop on chemical pollution and marine mammals
- CMS COP Resolution 11.15 (2011) on Guidelines to Prevent Risk of Poisoning to Migratory Birds
- Resolution 11.26 Programme of Work on Climate Change and Migratory Species
- Resolution 11.27 Renewable Energy and Migratory Species
- CMS COP Resolution 10.11 (2011) on Power lines and migratory birds
- Memorandum of Understanding concerning conservation measures for marine turtles of the Atlantic coast of Africa: Conservation and Management Plan for Marine Turtles of the Atlantic coast of Africa
- Memorandum of Understanding for the Conservation of cetaceans and their habitats in the Pacific Islands Region: Whale and Dolphin Action Plan 2013-2017
- MoU concerning the conservation of the Manatee and small cetaceans of Western Africa and Macaronesia: Action Plan for the conservation of small cetaceans of Western Africa and Macaronesia
- Conservation and Management Plan of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of Marine Turtles and their Habitats of the Indian Ocean and South-East Asia
- Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of Dugongs (Dugon dugong) and their Habitats throughout their Range
- Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia
- Central Asian Flyways Action Plan for the conservation of migratory waterbirds and their habitats (CAF)
- Action Plan for the conservation of southern South American migratory grassland bird species and their habitats
- Resolution 10.3- The Role of Ecological Networks in the Conservation of Migratory Species
- CMS Family Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines for marine noise-generating activities
- Resolution on Dolphin swim-with programmes (see report of Scientific Council 1st Sessional Committee meeting 2016)
- ASCOBANS MOP8 Resolution on ocean energy (see AC22 report)
- ASCOBANS MOP8 Resolution on Impacts of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) (see AC22 report)
- ASCOBANS MOP8 Resolution on Addressing the threat from underwater unexploded ordnance (UXO) (see AC22 report)
- ASCOBANS MOP8 Resolution on Managing cumulative anthropogenic impacts in the marine environment (see AC22 Report)
- Programme of Work of the Central Asian Mammals Initiative
- Saiga-Medium-Term International Work Programme (for the Saiga Antelope (2016-2020)
- International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Argali
C - Key partnerships and other supporting delivery frameworks
D - Capacity development
- CMS Capacity-building Strategy 2015-2017
- In the Climate Change and Migratory Species Programme of Work - CMS COP Resolution 11.26
- Programme of Work of the Central Asian Mammals Initiative
- Saiga-Medium-Term International Work Programme for the Saiga Antelope (2016-2020)
- International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Argali
E - Resourcing for biodiversity (including human, technical and financial resources)
Section to be completed soon
F - Monitoring and evaluation, including indicators, milestones and feedback to the sub-targets, as well as headline measures of success by which overall success of the SPMS may be judged
- Memorandum of Understanding for the Conservation of cetaceans and their habitats in the Pacific Islands Region: Whale and Dolphin Action Plan 2013-2017
- MoU concerning the conservation of the Manatee and small cetaceans of Western Africa and Macaronesia: Action Plan for the conservation of small cetaceans of Western Africa and Macaronesia
- International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Argali
- Indicator Factsheets
G - Reporting on and review of progress at national level and by governing bodies such as the CMS COP